I’m going to assume that you @Gladi099 are requesting evidence in good faith. I’m also going to assume that you have not been keeping up with what has been going on.
At the beginning of the conflict, Tex said in the PrUn general discord “yes, I am suggesting the community drive Prdgi from the game”:
coupled with public statements claiming not to have performed any piracy
in combination with character assassination from Houston
This indicates that they are indeed following up on the call to “drive Prdgi from the game”.
Stepping through the remainder of the narrative, we have further threats of out-of-mechanics harrassment
I am the toxicity in the community?
This is an attempt to isolate me from the community
Responses formulated within the context of game mechanics are absolutely ok. Reframing the narrative to ignore toxic communication is not ok.
Toxic communication, character assassination, harassment etc… is necessary? Also reframing the narrative to paint GDP/myself as actively attacking the community rather than testing ingame mechanics.
More attempts at isolating me from the community
Hopping threads now into “CUOP - Mid-term update”
“You deserve it, look what you made me do”
Threats of ongoing harassment
Again
Other players recognise toxic behaviour
Obviously not a tongue-in-cheek roleplay given all the above
Again, blaming me for other player’s toxic behaviour.
In addition to all of this, bobemor feels confused as to why I have stated that they contribute to the toxicity. Bobemor has continually attempted to build strawmen and use them to assassinate CUOP. “They’re trying to control shipbuilding” etc…
This is clearly defamation.
Houston knows our plans better than we do? False-representation? Libel?
All of CUOP are being targeted.
Are we seriously being likened to nazis?
I’ve seen messages calling me “cruel and vindictive” by bobemor. I’ve seen messages saying all of CUOP should be vaporised.
Do I need to go on @Gladi099? Is this enough for you to say, “we don’t want that behaviour here”? Do you want to sit back and say “Well it needs more context…”? That is simply a defence tactic to attempt to shift blame onto the victim.
Note: This post and the post directly below by gladi were written roughly in tandem. I had posted in multiple edits due to accidentally posting portions. Gosh-danged ctrl+enter.